Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-05-12-Speech-1-021"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-05-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Order of business2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030512.4.1-021"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-05-12-Speech-1-0222
lpv:speaker	lp:Konstantinos Hatzidakis2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Nea Dimokratia (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EPP-ED (2002-03-08--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, in connection with the question submitted on postal services, I should like to say on behalf of the European People's Party that we are opposed to the inclusion of this question on the agenda for the following reason: the arrangement which the Commission promised to put in place, by which I mean the division between reserve and non-reserve activities in the same legal entity, basically concerns one Member State and the two existing directives therefore contain an authorisation in relation to postal services. No legislative procedure is therefore required. This is a question of compliance by just one Member State with existing postal arrangements. Procedure 86.3, which the honourable Members criticise, is in our view perfectly legal. We therefore consider the question to be superfluous."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph