Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-04-09-Speech-3-289"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-04-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030409.6.3-289"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-04-09-Speech-3-2902
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"I would have been grateful if you could have put this question when we reached the time for your question out of respect for the agenda, not at the time of your pleasing. You have been informed, Mr Nogueira, that the President of Parliament in accordance with his competences and with the Rules of Procedure, and this has been communicated this morning – as you and I have discussed both inside and outside the chamber – has stated that Question No 13 which you have raised is not admissible because it contains statements or judgments, which I do not intend to go into. Imagine, for example, that you were a Finnish Member and I a German Member, in order not to get into an issue under discussion in Spain. I am simply talking about the Rules of Procedure. I must say to you, since you ask my opinion, that having read the note from the President and the question, I agree with the President of Parliament. I believe that you have also approached the office of the President to say that if you reformulate the question and present it for next month it will be dealt with. Provided that it is in accordance with our Rules of Procedure, and I will not comment on the questions from other Members, because that is not my job, particularly as to whether they have ‘sinned’. I only organise the debate here, I have absolutely no obligation to define sins or sinful or irregular behaviour. I very much value your contributions but today your question has been declared inadmissible. There is another point of order from Mr Staes, who has the floor."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President. –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph