Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-12-Speech-3-222"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030312.6.3-222"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-03-12-Speech-3-2232
lpv:speaker	lp:Sylviane H. Ainardi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-09-23--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2003-05-11)3 unknown; Parti communiste français (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Thank you, Mr President, for everything that you have said, but allow me to also stress my point because Parliament has also followed all the Commission and Council initiatives to speed up the implementation of the ERIKA I and ERIKA II packages. You referred to the fresh measures taken regarding the IMO, but the reason why Parliament has proposed that flags of convenience be banned is that we are all well aware, in the debates that we have had following maritime disasters, that the nature of flags of convenience is that in the event of problems, it is incredibly difficult to locate those responsible. We are well aware that, throughout the chain that links the flag, the State, the captain of the boat and the various crews, it is no longer possible to determine in the end who we are going to ask to be held criminally and financially responsible, which is the reason for Parliament’s proposal. I must stress this. It is true that the Commission should take the initiative, but I would like to know how, as President-in-Office of the Council, you are going to support this proposal by Parliament."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph