Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-03-12-Speech-3-205"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030312.6.3-205"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
As far as your first question is concerned, as I said, discussions have not yet opened on the final status of Kosovo, Of course, various groups could be set up if necessary, as you suggest. What we have been trying to do is to get Belgrade and Pristina to talk about matters of common interest, such as the return of refugees, security issues, energy and other networks and so on, where by definition cooperation is needed if greater trust is to be generated between the two sides before moving on to the next stage, which is the discussion on final status. So irrespective of what the constitution of Yugoslavia or the new state of Serbia-Montenegro says, there has been no discussion on final status and, when there is, it will be, as I said, on the basis of the UN resolution. We all know which UN resolution I mean, so there is no need for me to refer to it at this point. It is Security Council Resolution 1244."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples