Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-01-14-Speech-2-091"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20030114.3.2-091"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:translated text
". You are using the pretext of ending the national fragmentation of the European rail network, which should have been integrated long ago, as an excuse to impose an even worse type of fragmentation between competing private interests. The claim that a so-called Community safety system will be developed at best reflects your concern given the likely scenario. Private interests will be concerned with maximising their profits. They will not prioritise investment in human resources and materials to ensure adequate safety standards. In truth, you only refer to the issue of safety to ensure that ‘additional national requirements’ cannot ‘restrict market access’. The safety standards you refer to are minimum standards, which will lead to disasters on the railways. We rejected the report and we maintain that the public service ethos of rail services should not be altered. We are also opposed to the concept of public service being lost in the pursuit of profit."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph