Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-01-14-Speech-2-084"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-01-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030114.3.2-084"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-01-14-Speech-2-0852
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Louis Bernié2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Chasse, Pêche, Nature, Traditions (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EDD (2001-07-05--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2003-01-28)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr Jarzembowski’s report seems to us to have benefited from the Commission’s proposal to extend the scope of the process of opening up to competition to a sector where we believe the concept of public service is fundamental. Opening up the sector to competition in this way, and also opening up Members States’ rail networks infrastructure within a short timescale, could be detrimental to the development of Europe’s railways. In particular, the process would introduce instability and uncertainty into a market that requires technological solutions and a high level of long-term investment. We are aware that, on the one hand, public services must ensure that they treat all their users throughout the country equally, regardless of their individual circumstances. On the other hand, opening up the sector to competition could reduce or even do away altogether with any such concept of public service. We therefore oppose all moves towards liberalisation unless it is first proved that it will have genuine added value. The current situation in a number of Member States demonstrate the shortcomings of a system whose sole aim is to make the greatest possible profit. Unfortunately the Commission has not taken account of the consequences of such a system. They can easily be quantified but have been disguised for purely dogmatic reasons. This is why we voted against the Jarzembowski report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph