Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-12-17-Speech-2-197"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Draft Commission and Council report on the future of pension systems / Modernisation of accounting2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021217.6.2-197"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-12-17-Speech-2-1982
lpv:speaker	lp:Helmut Kuhne2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, please excuse me if I have to leave before you reply, but I have a group of visitors and it is my custom to be punctual. That is not usual everywhere in Europe, but I do it. I have a very precise question. You said you wanted to carry out a feasibility study about the IT system. Now we agree that we are under pressure of time so far as the modernisation of the accounting system is concerned. When I think about it, on the grounds of plausibility it seems to me that a feasibility study can only refer to option 2, namely modernising the existing system in such a way that it also satisfies future requirements. My question is, given that we are all under pressure of time and that the system must be modernised, would it not be more sensible to save time by not asking this question and going straight for a complete integrated replacement of this system?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph