Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-12-05-Speech-4-112"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20021205.3.4-112"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". According to the Commission, the implementation of a new framework regulation as a replacement for those of 1976 and 1992 is justified by ‘a general threat to all fisheries resources’. It appears however, according to professionals and scientists, that only certain species need to be protected. This shows that the reform should therefore focus on more specific management organised according to the different species and fishing areas, in order to deal properly with the realities of the situation. Furthermore, I wish to reiterate the express demand of the ‘Friends of Fishing Group’ to see strict controls applied to industrial fishing. How can the Commission seek to implement sustainable fishing whilst also encouraging this type of fishing, excluding it from its proposal, when it has a particularly damaging effect on ecosystems? As regards abolishing State aid for building new boats and reallocating previously granted funds to alternative activities, I stress the absolute need to see structural aid maintained and even increased since it only represents 0.84% of the Community budget, in order to modernise and make the fleet safer, particularly the small-scale fishing fleet. To sum up, I shall say that, once again, I am surprised by the European logic which prevails in the area of common policy."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph