Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-11-21-Speech-4-085"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20021121.4.4-085"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". At the time when this proposal was put on the agenda, support from an overwhelming majority was already guaranteed. This support is much wider than was the case for previous proposals on the subject of tobacco. Perhaps this is because it cannot be objected to on legal or economic grounds. This is not a piece of legislation, but merely an initiative that gives an opinion on Parliament's behalf, a non-binding recommendation for the Member States, of which they are free to make use as they see fit. In many cases, I wish that decisions from this Parliament had this status, particularly dealing with such matters as the liberalisation of the economy or the reduction of government spending. This is different from cross-border environmental and public health issues, in which it is useful to learn from each other and to carry out the toughest protection measures as a joint effort. Unfortunately, according to the UN Treaty, the prevention and control of smoking do not fall within the scope of the market but under public health, an area in which the Commission can merely make a recommendation to the Member States. I have come unstuck on this point before, when I made proposals for protection against asbestos. This time round, the Council has already made known to us its lack of interest in Parliament’s opinion. I endorse the proposals against smuggling, cinema advertising, and chocolate cigarettes, but do not hold out any high hopes."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph