Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-24-Speech-4-103"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-10-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021024.4.4-103"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-10-24-Speech-4-1042
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2002-03-06--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"The resolution on ‘Assessment of and prospects for the EU strategy on terrorism one year after 11 September 2001’ contains several contradictions. Amongst others, I would highlight, some of its more negative aspects: its defence of the militarisation of the ‘fight against terrorism’, examples of which are changing the current concept of defence to what is being called a ‘broader concept of security’, which includes ‘pre-emptive strikes’, such as we are seeing now, at the hands of George W. Bush, confusing Member States’ internal security missions with defence policy; the reaffirmation of NATO and of partnership with the USA as a framework reference for the EU in the ‘fight against terrorism’; its support for the reform of NATO (its political and military structures) in order to change its defence alliance missions into an offensive alliance; its willingness to criminalise the action of organisations and movements that fight, sometimes by means of an armed struggle, against the repression with which their peoples are targeted, confusing these with ‘terrorism’; the use of the war against terrorism to move ahead with the communitarisation of Justice and Home Affairs in the EU. Hence our vote against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph