Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-10-22-Speech-2-201"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-10-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20021022.7.2-201"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-10-22-Speech-2-2022
lpv:speaker	lp:Philip Bushill-matthews2
lpv:spoken text	"I note your remarks with interest, Commissioner, and am delighted to hear that the Commission takes this issue seriously, but your role as I see it seems to be confined to reminding Member States, requesting strong action and then requesting to be informed. With respect, do you feel that is satisfactory or do you feel that the public will find that satisfactory, because these are problems that are recurring? Since I tabled this question, literally in the last couple of weeks, we have had an example in the UK of Germany once again breaking the rules by sending no less than its 13th consignment of meat containing banned spinal cord to the UK. Has the Commission no powers to do anything more than request or remind? If it does not, should it not have such powers? How much longer will it go on requesting and reminding before some action is taken by somebody?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Bushill-Matthews (PPE-DE )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph