Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-09-04-Speech-3-188"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020904.6.3-188"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I should like to answer Question 6 by Mr Carlos Lage.
As regards the first question, I would like to draw attention to the fact that neither Article 33 of the EU Treaty nor Article 64(1) of the EC Treaty gives the Council the ability to intervene to maintain public order or security in the Member States. This also applies to public-order measures which the Member States take when meetings of the European Council are held within their territory. This is therefore something in which the Community cannot interfere.
As regards the second question, I would like to refer to the Executive Committee Decision of 20 December 1995 on the procedure for applying Article 2(2) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, which has a long reference number which I do not want to read out.
This Decision draws up detailed rules for when controls can be reintroduced at the internal borders. It constitutes a part of the so-called Schengen rules, and it is thus binding for all Schengen States. Incidentally, it is published in OJ L 239 of 22 September 2000, page 133."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples