Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-07-04-Speech-4-094"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020704.4.4-094"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
We voted against the resolution on the conclusions of the European Council in Seville, because it approves the confusing statements which seek to mislead the Irish people in the run-up to their second referendum on the Treaty of Nice.
These two statements – the first, unilateral in nature, made by Ireland, and the second made by the Council which takes account of the former (or takes note of it, depending on the language version) – seem to guarantee each country’s freedom of choice in terms of security and defence policy in general, and in terms of each process in particular. But this is not the spirit of Nice. If they say ‘yes’ in the second referendum, the people of Ireland will become trapped by texts which will inevitably lead them further into integration, which is what they do not want.
Unfortunately, I am unable to continue on this subject here, since the European Parliament’s administrative service has decided to cut down every explanation of vote that exceeds 200 words. But people who want to know the truth about European affairs, and who are tired of the truth being hidden in Parliament’s official debates, can log on to the web site of the French
members, at the following address: http://www.autre-europe.org."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples