Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-12-Speech-3-190"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-06-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Enlargement of the Union2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020612.5.3-190"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-06-12-Speech-3-1912
lpv:speaker	lp:Yves Piétrasanta2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-02-02)3 vice-chair; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-23--2004-02-02)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-02-02)3 unknown; Les Verts-Europe-Ecologie (1999-07-20--2004-02-02)3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-02-02)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, on the subject of fisheries, this report does not carry out a detailed analysis of the overall advantages of the structural funds and of the amounts allocated for each programme, for example the management of fishing fleets, decommissioning, fish farming etc. The Green Paper asks whether the FIFG has contributed to the sustainability of fish stocks or whether it has introduced a distortion into the industry. Have all the resources allocated to the restructuring of the fleet contributed to the creation of a fleet which has selective fishing methods, high-quality products and a maximum employment rate, or have they simply had the effect of speeding up the process of industrialisation, squeezing out the small vessels and turning them into large vessels, with all the social and economic consequences that that implies? The Commission will have to try to answer this question during the current debate on the common fisheries policy."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph