Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-11-Speech-2-266"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20020611.12.2-266"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Mr President, it is a real procedural motion this time. By this, I mean that some MEPs, myself included at times, take advantage of this possibility, but this is a real procedural motion. I am a loyal customer of question time. I therefore prepare my questions. I knew that Mr Kinnock would be present, and I therefore asked Mr Kinnock a very specific question. This is question No 18 about language use in the European institutions. The services of Parliament have included this question in the third section, that is, the second question in the third section, although it was an explicit question for Mr Kinnock. I do not understand this. I will now only receive a written reply, while I might have wanted to ask Mr Kinnock additional questions. Can you explain to me how the procedure worked in this case, and why a question addressed to Mr Kinnock still ends up in the third section?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph