Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-11-Speech-2-145"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020611.8.2-145"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the ten elected Members of the European Free Alliance, the sum total of the regionalist and nationalist Members within the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance, have a problem with recital C. It does state that it is possible to establish regional constituencies for elections, whereby, however – and I quote – “the proportional representation of political families at Member State level must not be undermined”.
Could I point out that in the Belgian system, Member State level for European elections is totally irrelevant? Dutch-speakers and French-speakers go to the ballot boxes in two separate constituencies for elections which are totally unrelated to each other. In my opinion, recital C is a liberal interpretation of Article 2 of the Council’s draft decision. Moreover, the different language versions – just read the French, Dutch and English versions – are not identical.
The European Free Alliance is also struggling with the reference to transnational lists in recital D. In our opinion, this practice will lead to an even greater erosion of political diversity in this hemisphere. Indeed, it is making it even more difficult for smaller political formations to obtain seats at transnational, national and regional level, certainly when this is combined with the 5% electoral threshold. This is why the ten MEPs of the European Fee Alliance will not be endorsing the present recommendation by Mr Gil Robles."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples