Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-05-14-Speech-2-128"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-05-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020514.8.2-128"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-05-14-Speech-2-1292
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexandros Alavanos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2002-02-07--2004-04-14)3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-04-14)3
lpv:translated text	". The report and the motion for a resolution on a European strategy for tourism, an industry which is hugely important to the economy of and employment in the European Union and which is widely neglected, contains a number of excellent points, which is why I shall vote in favour of it. However, I should like to add the following: First: the European Union should revert to the idea of a special programme on tourism, such as the PHILOXENIA proposal which came up against opposition from a number of Member States. Secondly: one specific aspect of Community policy should be support for small and medium-sized enterprises in tourist areas which risk being bled to death by the major tour operators in the European Union. Thirdly: we need a broader-based policy to reconcile tourist developments with the history, landscape and specific traditions of individual tourist areas, many of which have already been disfigured by impersonal, industrial tourist developments."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph