Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-04-10-Speech-3-158"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20020410.4.3-158"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". At the risk of upsetting the harmonious unanimity in this Assembly, which, in any case, seems rather artificial to me, I would like to make two comments in relation to this debate. First, I see that, once again, the European Union, in general, and this Parliament, in particular, are getting involved in other countries’ business. As far as I am aware, the Russian Federation is not a member of the European Union. So on what grounds, then, are we interfering in the domestic affairs of this sovereign state? The situation in Chechnya is certainly tragic. However, war is always deplorable, in particular when it is started by seditionaries against the legitimate authority of a state. Whatever upholders of humanitarian interventionism say, the operations carried out by the Russian forces in Chechen territory, and let us not forget that Chechnya is an integral part of the Russian Federation, are conducted by a regular army, under the authority of a democratically-elected president, and therefore concern the simple maintenance of law and order. Unless Parliament wants to stand as a moralising policeman giving lessons to the whole world, it does not have the least authority to judge the behaviour of the Russian forces in Chechnya. I have said this before and I repeat, today this Assembly is meddling in matters that do not concern it."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph