Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-04-10-Speech-3-088"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-04-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020410.4.3-088"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-04-10-Speech-3-0892
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Louis Bourlanges2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2002-01-17--2002-09-01)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2002-08-28)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-06--2004-04-30)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2002-02-06--2004-04-30)3 unknown; Union pour la démocratie française (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2002-03-08--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to move a point of order regarding Annex 5. The Rules of Procedure state that, on decisions giving discharge, the House shall vote on the basis of a report by the Committee on Budgetary Control, regardless of whether discharge is refused or granted. The report submitted by Mrs Morgan tended towards favouring a certain decision. We cannot now recommend that the House take a different decision. I fully understand Mrs Morgan’s objections. This group was not responsible for initiating a dispute with the Council on this issue; on the contrary in fact, we called for moderation. Now we believe that, in order to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion, we must, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure, refer this report back to committee, or at least the part of the report that concerns the Council, and vote on the rest of the report. But we must refer back to committee the part of the report regarding discharge to the Council. This is the only solution that conforms with common sense and also with the Rules of Procedure."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph