Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-12-Speech-2-154"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (noise)2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020312.8.2-154"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-03-12-Speech-2-1552
lpv:speaker	lp:Helle Thorning-schmidt2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-04-30)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Socialdemokratiet (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to begin with a comment on the Rules of Procedure, and I assume that the time it takes will not be deducted from my speaking time. I think we should try something new in Parliament today. What I envisage doing is dividing my five minutes in such a way that I am allowed to talk for four minutes to introduce the debate and for one minute to conclude it, once the Commissioner has made her speech. I propose this in the light of two factors. First of all, I understand that the Conference of Presidents had an ‘away day’ last week, when they decided to have more lively debates here in the House. The second factor is Rule 121, paragraph 4 of the Rules of Procedure. I asked the Sittings Directorate, before I came here today, if what I propose was possible. I was told flatly it was not, but I want to ask permission to do what I propose, given that there is nothing in the Rules of Procedure to prevent such a procedure. I therefore assume that you will be sympathetic towards organising matters in this way today."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph