Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-01-17-Speech-4-084"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020117.5.4-084"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"We Swedish Social Democrats, Mr Andersson, Mrs Hulthén, Mr Färm and Mr Karlsson, voted against Amendment No 63 because we think it important to have framework agreements for intellectual services too. The designation, ‘intellectual services’ should be specified. In Sweden, framework agreements concerning, for example, architectural, medical, auditing, banking and consultancy services are quite usual.
If this amendment were to be implemented, it would have very awkward consequences in Sweden.
We Swedish Social Democrats voted in favour of Amendment No 16, which we consider to be a well balanced amendment. It is desirable that public contracts should not be awarded to economic operators who have belonged to criminal organisations or have been guilty of acts involving corruption or fraud. We nonetheless believe it important that the recitals show that it is the Member States that are to determine which conditions are to be fulfilled and what penalty is to have been imposed for the judgement to involve exclusion.
We also voted in favour of Amendments Nos 48, 79-83, and 86-90, but would nonetheless point out that we really do not think that an enumeration of these different crimes belongs in a directive such as this, because such a list can never be complete."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples