Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-11-13-Speech-2-140"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-11-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011113.7.2-140"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-11-13-Speech-2-1412
lpv:speaker	lp:Jules Maaten2
lpv:spoken text	". The ELDR Group voted against in the final vote on the Langen report, because its members are not convinced that a framework directive on services of general interest (SGI) is a good idea. At least we want to wait for the Commission's reflections on the desirability and feasibility of a framework directive on SGIs before we insist on such a proposal. Another reason for our vote against is the ambiguous wordings on the need to stick to the Lisbon agenda. We found that the text was too watered down (for example in the votes pertaining to par. 33). Liberals also find that the report, through amendments both in committee and in plenary, had become too long, inconsistent and incoherent and that it therefore, unfortunately, no longer presented any added value to the debate on SGIs."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Temporary committee on human genetics and other new technologies in modern medicine (2000-12-13--2001-11-29)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; ELDR (1999-07-20--2002-03-06)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Maaten (ELDR ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph