Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-25-Speech-4-180"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Community fisheries (1997-2001)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011025.5.4-180"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-10-25-Speech-4-1812
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Varela Suanzes-carpegna2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-07)3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (1999-11-11--2002-01-14)3 substitute; PETI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-09-01--2002-01-14)3 chair; PECH (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would also like to congratulate our rapporteur, Mrs Attwooll, for the spirit of consensus she has created in our committee in order to arrive at compromise amendments, particularly with Mrs Fraga Estevez and to substantially improve, as has been said, the Commission’s proposal on a key issue, which we all recognise, in the current common fisheries policy and in the policy that we are creating for the coming years. European fleet policy is a sensitive and complicated issue – this is something we all agree upon. However, if each State defends its own interests and only complies when it is in its own interest, we clearly get nowhere. Therefore, the Commission must rise to the challenge, through an effective policy accepted by everyone, of designing a fleet that is really suited to our fishing needs. A safe, effective and competitive fleet. Mrs Attwooll’s report, like the report by Mr Busk, is currently of fundamental importance. We want it to draw attention, on the one hand, to the fact that the increase in onboard safety measures has nothing to do with increasing fishing capacity or power, and on the other, to the need not to introduce substantial last-minute changes to programmes which have been in operation for five years, because an annual extension is one thing, but to change fundamental conditions in the general philosophy of the MAGPs now, at the last minute, is quite another. I therefore hope that the House supports this message which the Committee on Fisheries wants to send this afternoon, and that the Commission will, of course, take it into account."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph