Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-04-Speech-4-080"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011004.3.4-080"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
". – We voted against this draft regulation for a number of reasons. We strongly believe that granting such powers without proper debate and without a parliamentary report on the matter is legally questionable. The fact that the protection of civil liberties is not addressed in the regulation is appalling, and the invoking of Article 308 sets a dangerous precedent for rushing through emergency legislation without any open and transparent debate. It is also questionable whether the European Commission had the right to invoke this article in such circumstances and it could be in breach of some national constitutions.
The European Parliament was asked to vote on a list of 27 organisations without any explanation as to the basis under which they were chosen, who or what they are, and without any mention of safeguards if one of these organisations or persons was wrongfully accused.
We do not believe that the European Parliament has the right to act as judge and jury on such matters and most especially when the facts are not clearly explained in a transparent and open manner. We of course welcome any new measures to combat terrorism; however, such measures must be properly thought out and properly debated in a transparent and democratic manner, not, as happened this week, in a atmosphere of panic. Any new measures must enshrine human rights, protect civil liberties and recognise the assumption of innocence, if they are to be truly effective."@en1
|
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"McKenna and Lucas (Verts/ALE ),"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples