Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-03-Speech-2-148"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010703.9.2-148"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-07-03-Speech-2-1492
lpv:speaker	lp:Nielson2
lpv:spoken text	". – The short answer is 'no'. The Cotonou Agreement is quite clear and – not that I expected this follow-up question – that is the substance of the problem and the reason I said what I did at the end of my answer. The dates involved are negotiated dates. Not adhering to them would create more problems and, in any case, one can always discuss whether one more seminar would change the world, rather than face the need to make difficult decisions that will become part of this entire process for our partners in the ACP group."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Commission"1 "Nielson,"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph