Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-06-13-Speech-3-075"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-06-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010613.2.3-075"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-06-13-Speech-3-0762
lpv:speaker	lp:Piia-Noora Kauppi2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"— Mr President, Mr Voggenhuber has presented us with a serious problem, calling Jörg Heider a fascist and his party a neo-fascist party. Mr Voggenhuber himself hopes his parliamentary immunity might be waived, as he has very persuasively shown our group that this is a matter of standing up for freedom of speech, which is something he wishes to be involved in. He therefore wants to fight verbally against this sort of fascist party and its leader, and he would not want parliamentary immunity to be a barrier to this. Consequently, I have to inform you, Mr President, that, unlike the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market, my group will respect Mr Voggenhuber’s wishes, as it considers them to be totally justified, and will recommend that his parliamentary immunity be waived. This does by no means imply that we should question the principles adhered to by the Committee on Legal Affairs or the fact that it should stand to its principles, but in this case we consider that there are good reasons why Parliament can best safeguard its own independence by accepting this challenge Mr Heider has issued to Mr Voggenhuber."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph