Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-16-Speech-3-071"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010516.4.3-071"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
". – Mr President, Amendments Nos. 2, 9 and 13 would extend the export ban by removing the possibility for an exemption, while Amendment No 12 would remove the principle of an export ban where a product is temporarily banned. The Commission considers that both approaches go too far, and indeed that they go in opposite directions. So these amendments are not acceptable to the Commission. In our judgment Amendment No 3 on external certification also goes too far. The Commission could only accept a simple reference to their value in a recital. The Commission can accept the reference to action on services in Amendment No 1 on the first recital but not the specific commitment set out in Amendment No 11.
In summary therefore the Commission can accept in full or in part Amendments Nos 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 and the Commission cannot accept Amendments Nos 2, 3, 9, 11, 12 and 13."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples