Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-15-Speech-2-067"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-05-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Priority substances in water policy2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010515.4.2-067"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-05-15-Speech-2-0682
lpv:speaker	lp:Encarnación Redondo Jiménez2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-10-05--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; AGRI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2000-04-03--2002-03-07)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (1999-09-14--2002-01-14)3 substitute; BUDG (1999-09-01--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, in the field of water policy, the final agreement of June 2000 lays down that the Commission should identify, within the class of hazardous substances, certain priority hazardous substances, whose emission, dumping or loss must cease or be gradually reduced within a time limit of 20 years. The European Commission has amended its proposal so that, by means of a group of experts, the priority hazardous substances should firstly be identified, and secondly a revision clause should introduced which would apply to some of them and, thirdly, the terminology and final text should be adapted. Of the 32 priority substances identified, 11 are proposed as priority hazardous substances, 11 more as priority substances under investigation – all of this within 4 years of the entry into force of the framework directive. There is no data on the toxicity, persistence or bioaccumulation of the remaining 10 substances. The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, whose three amendments should be supported, points out that natural nutrients should not be classed as priority hazardous substances and, on the issue of plant protection products, there is already an established procedure: Directive 91/414, which should be respected, as well as the decision that it must be adapted at the same time, not before and not later. Lastly, the different definitions should be reorganised, such as the hydrographical district or the management of those districts, since that would prevent the various regulations from having differing effects on the same territories and problems, which could happen on applying the DMA, the COMMPS and the OSPAR agreements."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph