Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-03-Speech-4-019"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010503.2.4-019"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, over the past year, we have seen a slight improvement in the budgetary situation. That was, however, not due to the policy adopted but rather to incidents and unexpected strokes of luck, such as stronger economic growth and the auction of UMTS.
The favourable economic tide should have been used to bring about reforms. There is not so much a need for new initiatives as there is for the implementation of politically-inspired objectives. The areas which require attention are clear: reforms on the labour market, fiscal reforms, liberalisation of the utility sectors and greater incentives for entrepreneurship.
At 2.6% in March, inflation is still far too high. Interest rates cannot be lowered as a result. Whether you like it or not, the ECB’s objective is price stability. Moreover, the real interest level is low enough to offer an incentive for growth.
The risk of price increases upon the introduction of the euro is another reason for the European Central Bank to maintain interest at its current level.
Both growth, wrongly expected by some from the ECB, and a better functioning internal market, will need to be achieved in and by the Member States themselves. The call for more coordination of the economic policy is then not the most effective approach. The stability and convergence programmes are right to confine themselves to the monetary policy.
In short, the rapporteur’s call for an acceleration of the structural reforms receives my unqualified support."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples