Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-02-Speech-3-029"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010502.2.3-029"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"You have just done a great job in showing that this issue is certainly of a political nature. However, I should like to return to the subject of the law. You said that respecting the Rules of Procedure meant referral to the committee responsible. Mr Barón Crespo, several years ago, we had an MEP in this House who was held in great esteem by all Members of this Parliament. This MEP was Mrs Marie-Claude Vayssade, Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market.
Here is what Mrs Vayssade wrote in a letter dated 8 March 1985. She said that she would like to point out straight away that, pursuant to Rule 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure, a request for the waiver of immunity can only be referred once it has been established that the request is from the appropriate authority. Therefore, I believe that this condition must be fulfilled before this is done, as well as the announcement to Parliament and the referral to committee, a point also laid down in the Rule 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Once again, Mr Barón Crespo, there really is no getting away from the facts and you have my sympathy but everything points to this. I am slightly weary of these groundless accusations and we know exactly what lies at the root of them."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples