Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-04-Speech-3-211"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20010404.7.3-211"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Question No 15 by Josu Ortuondo Larrea (): Northern hake is found from the coast of the Basque Country to the coasts of Norway and the fishing grounds are divided up into sea areas (ICES Division IIIa, Sub-Areas IV, VI and VII and Divisions VIIIa and b). Why is it that the proposal of the Council for the management of Northern hake stocks and its final resolution have the effect of dividing the fishing rights for this species into sea areas when the hake population is considered by the ICES as one management unit for which the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management provides unified scientific advice and does not recommend its being divided up by sea area? Does this not discriminate against fleets according to their geographical distribution and habitual fishing areas? Would it not be fairer for fishermen to catch fish in accordance with their respective fishing quotas in one unified zone?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Northern hake fishing – discrimination inherent in the division of TACs by sea area"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph