Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-04-Speech-3-209"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010404.7.3-209"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-04-Speech-3-2102
lpv:speaker	lp:Lennart Sacrédeus2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Kristdemokraterna (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees and delegations for relations with Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova (1999-10-07--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"I want to thank Mr Danielsson for that answer. I am not in any way surprised about this clear distinction, which in itself is perfectly correct, when it comes to the EU’s areas of competence. I would nonetheless remind you that the new draft law in the Netherlands concerning medically assisted suicides is a source of serious concern in many countries. History has shown the danger of such a development. I would point out that this draft law in actual fact enables children of twelve years and over, with their parents’ permission, to be present at medically assisted suicides and also enables children of sixteen years and over to decide for themselves their parents’ permission, whether or not they wish to be present. This is an issue to which we cannot close our eyes in a Europe in which the Austria debate has raised questions concerning human dignity. I should nonetheless like to be told whether or not the issue of this law in the Netherlands in way affects the debate on values within the European Union."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"any"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph