Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-04-Speech-3-149"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010404.7.3-149"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-04-Speech-3-1502
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexandros Alavanos2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3,3 member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3,3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I shall overlook the fact that your reply was something of a "Lord have mercy" to Javier Solana. You mentioned his name five times and maybe it is better to leave him out of it when we are discussing the Balkans. But to get back to the point of my question. Your standpoint has one positive aspect – the Council’s determination not to violate all the borders in the area. What I should like to ask, just to clarify matters and to stop playing with words, is: do we assume and do we mean that the borders of the whole of Yugoslavia, a Yugoslavia with no more Milosevic, a Yugoslavia with Milosevic in prison, also include Kosovo? I raise this with all due respect for the comments made to the effect that, if this problem is not resolved, we shall have continuing instability in the area."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph