Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-04-Speech-3-104"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Area of freedom, security and justice2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010404.5.3-104"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-04-Speech-3-1052
lpv:speaker	lp:Anna Terrón i Cusí2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; Temporary committee on the Echelon interception system (2000-07-06--2001-09-05)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Partit dels Socialistes de Catalunya (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, to analyse this year zero of the Tampere era we have, for the first time, a tool that will be extraordinarily useful, both now and in the future: the scoreboard set up by the Commission which, in future years, should include the progress made in the Council and the progress made in each of the Member States. A comparison between the initial forecasts and the latest revision of the scoreboard shows, for instance, how we have progressed – I would say remarkably – in matters of judicial cooperation. We have hopes for the future of Eurojust and this Parliament welcomes the decisions taken by the Council and the Member States’ initiatives which, in the field of judicial cooperation, have added to the Commission proposals, thus creating a circle that should be maintained in future. My Group also values the highly significant Commission communication on the mutual recognition of sentences in criminal matters. We hope it will be a solid base from which to combat crime, especially those more callous and intolerable versions such as terrorism. Ministers, we are well aware of what the European Commission has presented this last year in connection with the Tampere Agenda: it is on the scoreboard. What we do not know is what the Council is thinking of doing with them in the immediate future. In exchange, we have seen concrete and fragmentary proposals – I do not want to return to the debate we had in the previous sitting – from each Member State, which in this case we cannot accept at all, either now or in the future. Today we have also talked about the shock caused by the arrival of the “East Sea” in Europe. It shocked everyone, and I think it would have done so even more if the citizens knew that even before Tampere we had set up something which (talking of cooperation with the countries of origin) is called an action plan for northern Iraq, i.e. the Kurds. But the citizens do not know. Just as those of my country do not know that we have set up an action plan for Morocco, and while they keep finding the bodies of our young neighbours on their beaches they wonder what the European Union is doing. In fact, the impression given by the press is that not even our government knows. Laeken is going to be a new opportunity for the common immigration and asylum policy. Please do not just reaffirm the Tampere decisions again. Tell us how you intend to move forward. Please do not repeat that things are on the right road. Really convince yourselves that your decisions are good ones, and uphold them clearly and with determination and courage. Parliament – and I am sure in this respect the citizens too – will follow."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph