Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-03-13-Speech-2-110"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010313.11.2-110"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-03-13-Speech-2-1112
lpv:speaker	lp:Christoph Konrad2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the Daul report calls for an extension of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, and that is why I have rejected it. The system has got nothing to do with the market, it is more like something from a planned economy, a combination of production quotas, minimum prices, import tariffs and export subsidies. All in all, this is not something we should commend, it is something we should criticise, especially as it is downright expensive for the European taxpayer. The Member States allocate specific regions and quotas to the sugar manufacturers and this sugar is then sold within a protected national market. You have to bear in mind that 100 kg of white sugar cost EUR 28 on the world market and that the intervention price, the European Union's guaranteed price, is EUR 65. This is too expensive and it is bad for EU consumers and sugar processors. This is not a sustainable solution."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph