Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-11-14-Speech-2-087"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20001114.4.2-087"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
I would not wish to deny that there are things in the Charter that I am able to endorse. The same things are already to be found in the national constitutions, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the European Social Charter. In fact there is not a great deal in the Charter, despite the pressure brought to bear by the trade union movement, the environmental movement and human rights organisations. This means that as a document, the Charter is surplus to requirements. It is a propaganda document that creates the impression that something worthwhile has been achieved, when in reality this is not the case. In addition, it is confusing from the legal perspective, as a result of which the powers of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg are in competition with those of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. As such, the Charter is no more than an instrument of propaganda designed to show what a good thing it is that we have a European Union and that everyone should think themselves lucky. It
encroach on the national competences of the Member States but it does nothing for the European citizens. Unless it is amended in such a way as to shift the emphasis to social fundamental rights and the environment, I will be unable to vote in favour of adopting the Charter."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples