Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-10-25-Speech-3-121"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20001025.6.3-121"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-10-25-Speech-3-1222
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Lang2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; TGI (1999-07-20--2001-10-02)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; ECON (1999-09-09--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Front national (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3
lpv:translated text	". I cannot resist the pleasure of indulging in terms, or rather coining phrases, worthy of those used in the report in order to condemn your repeated e-pocrisy regarding employment and social protection. So you can rave on forever about the information society, which will resolve every last problem once everyone, from babes in arms to grey-beards, not forgetting illiterates, will have an email address even if they cannot afford to pay for the computer equipment to consult it. In fact, in your e-Europe efforts will be made to provide everyone with this equipment once the computers start looking at the users more than the users look at the computers and once they start drawing up reports. Your endless ravings are not quite so funny once we realise that their purpose is not the welfare of European citizens but ever more and more laws, directives and regulations from Brussels. Your concept of open cooperation is a reversion to an institutional system dominated by Commission officials. The only thing that is truly open, wide open, is the possibility of extending the powers of Brussels to infinity, without ever referring back to square one and the Treaties. You are proposing to give Brussels powers to manage and define minimum social protection, flexible work, which means exploiting the worker, imposing cuts on working hours, which freezes wages and handicaps enterprises, and an absolute stranglehold on social dialogue, like Aubry in France. That is why we will abstain on this report: for even if we welcome its display of concern, however spurious or even belated, for employment, we cannot in all decency approve its practical proposals."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph