Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-07-Speech-4-206"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-09-07"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Temelín nuclear power station2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000907.8.4-206"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-09-07-Speech-4-2072
lpv:speaker	lp:Karin Scheele2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (1999-09-14--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; Committee on Development and Cooperation (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, as the third Austrian to speak, I was starting to worry that I would have nothing to add. But having heard Mr Chichester, I think it is worth reiterating that we have to pay serious attention to the wishes and concerns of the people of Europe, and of Austria in particular, as regards nuclear energy. This applies especially to the Temelín nuclear power station. My group is supporting this motion for a resolution on Temelín for reasons of principle, because we take the people's concerns seriously and because many of us have, for a long time, been actively fighting against nuclear energy in the East and in the West. The political battle against the Zwentendorf nuclear power station in Austria has had an enduring formative influence on me personally, so I did not need to be convinced by the conservative arguments in the Austrian media over the last few days which I have followed with surprise and sometimes with quiet amusement. Like Mrs Echerer, I oppose the single, very vaguely worded amendment, because I believe that the phrase ‘high level’ does not mean anything, because the Czech Republic itself is surely aware of the need for a high level of safety. I therefore fully support the motion for a resolution before us and oppose the amendment."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph