Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-05-Speech-2-155"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000905.11.2-155"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-09-05-Speech-2-1562
lpv:speaker	lp:Christos Folias2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (1999-11-23--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Nea Dimokratia (1999-07-20--2004-03-09)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2000-04-03--2002-03-07)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2000-02-18--2002-01-14)3 chair; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway (2000-02-18--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to thank the minister for his reply; I naturally endorse the fact that the importance and value of the social partners in shaping a new model are much greater than anyone can imagine. But what I should like to ask is this: when a tripartite dialogue takes place between the two sides of industry and the national government, how far can the national government ignore what was jointly agreed and proposed by the social partners? Or, taken the other way, how binding on a government are proposals decided jointly by the social partners, who know better than anyone what the problems of society and the causes of unemployment are and what problems need to be solved in order to deal with unemployment, or how binding should they be on any national government?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph