Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-04-Speech-2-041"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:1998 discharge2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000704.2.2-041"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-04-Speech-2-0422
lpv:speaker	lp:Esko Seppänen2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Vasemmistoliitto (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; CONT (2000-05-03--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Estonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, when we talk of discharge, there is a poor spirit prevailing among the groups. I would like to show my support for Mrs Stauner, despite the fact that the Social Democrats criticise her. This may be based on the fact that during the Fléchard case, when Delors was the President of the Commission, the Head of his Private Office was the present Commissioner Lamy. Under no circumstances can we accept that certain documents, which would shed some light on the use of funds, have vanished. I would also like to support Mr Kuhne in the assessments he makes in his report, which, for its part, was criticised by members of the European People’s Party and European Democrats. In my opinion, parliamentary rapporteurs have to speak and write what they think about the use of parliamentary funds, in which case the interests of no group can put up a barrier. Our group agrees with the conclusion that discharge may on this occasion be granted."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph