Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-14-Speech-3-109"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000614.6.3-109"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-14-Speech-3-1102
lpv:speaker	lp:Bernd Posselt2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should just like to point out that I believe that the House has passed an illegal resolution in the vote on the calendar because a four-day week in Strasbourg would only be permitted if there were no additional plenary part-session in Brussels or, conversely, I believe that only if the full plenary week has been exhausted is it legal to hold additional plenary part-sessions in Brussels. Please have the legal implications checked as a matter of urgency. We have clearly passed a resolution which violates the spirit and probably even the letter of the Treaty. Because this could result in our holding one-day sessions here and five-day sessions elsewhere. That cannot be the purpose of the compromise. Apart from that, it is a huge waste of money to cut a day here and then hold additional plenary part-sessions."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph