Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-14-Speech-3-019"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Approval of the Minutes of the previous sitting2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000614.1.3-019"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-14-Speech-3-0202
lpv:speaker	lp:Gerhard Schmid2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; BUDG (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; PES (2000-03-08--2002-01-16)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-12-16--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Lannoye, that goes without saying! The Rules of Procedure are crystal clear: if the requisite number of signatures is collected, then a vote must be held in plenary following the decision of the Conference of Presidents, otherwise it would mean that the Conference of Presidents decides whether or not to set up a committee of inquiry rather than plenary. And, of course, that is not how it works. There may be one or two people in the Conference of Presidents who believe that it is, but they are labouring under a misapprehension! Mr Poettering says no-one believes that and so your problem is solved!"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Heckling, interjection by Mr Poettering))"1 "President. –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph