Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-13-Speech-2-259"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000613.17.2-259"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-13-Speech-2-2602
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Andersson2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Estonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-04-11--2000-09-27)3 unknown; Socialdemokratiska arbetarepartiet (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2000-10-03)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-22--2001-04-04)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (1999-10-06--2000-09-28)3
lpv:translated text	"I want to thank the Commissioner for her answer. Restructuring must not be prevented. Industrial restructuring is necessary, but developments in Europe in recent years have revealed a number of examples of restructuring’s having been carried out badly by companies, for example Michelin, ABB, Rover etc. The Gyllenhammar report makes the very point that restructuring is needed and that we have to find a framework to enable us to handle it properly in the future. The Gyllenhammar report has now been around for a couple of years. It puts forward one or two concrete proposals, for example for a supervisory centre and for a special responsibility on the part of the major companies to provide information in time. I wonder in what way the Commission is going to make use of the proposals made in the Gyllenhammar report a couple of years ago. How, very precisely, are you going to make use of these in the dialogue with employers and employees?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph