Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-05-18-Speech-4-267"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Human rights2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000518.11.4-267"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-05-18-Speech-4-2682
lpv:speaker	lp:Jules Maaten2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; ELDR (1999-07-20--2002-03-06)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, we are unable to support the submitted resolution. I was in favour of discussing the topic of hooliganism but this resolution can at best be described as agenda pollution. This Parliament should not be discussing safety during one particular Euro 2000 match under pressure from what I assume is a portion of British public opinion. It is also an insult to – in this case – the Belgian organisers of this game and the international authorities involved. This is a great pity because extensive discussions can be held about the fight against hooliganism itself. In addition, we continue to learn important lessons, such as for example, how we should really guide the fans? How can we better educate club managers and organisers of games? Attention should also be given to the so-called ‘second opinion’ which is now being applied, by means of which a group outside the organisation analyses the measures taken and suggests improvements. Mr President, hooligans have managed to spoil the fun of the real fans too often. It will be different at Euro 2000, as this will be a football party for everyone."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph