Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-05-18-Speech-4-030"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Statements by the President2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000518.1.4-030"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-05-18-Speech-4-0312
lpv:speaker	lp:Marie-Françoise Garaud2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 unknown; sans étiquette (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I wish to raise a procedural motion. I must remind Mr Wurtz that a tribunal does not deliver judgements. A court delivers judgements. He should brush up on his legal knowledge. That apart, the Legal Affairs Committee rightfully discussed this issue and Mr Wurtz was not there. As a result, he is ill-placed to criticise a confusion which did not exist. There was political confusion but no legal confusion. The position of the Legal Affairs Committee was simple. The decision is not final and therefore cannot be accepted. That apart, if the President wants to consult the plenary, this should at least pertain to a specific report, as pointed out by the committee’s chairperson. We cannot properly discuss and vote at midday on such a politically complex issue when this complexity is based on an internal contradiction between texts in French criminal law, which is not easily accessible to the Members of this House, including the French Members. If you decide that a vote must be held in this Parliament, this cannot occur without a committee report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph