Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-05-16-Speech-2-039"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000516.4.2-039"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I should like to ask a preliminary question, pursuant to Rule 143. The fact is, I think that tolerance can only be taken so far, and that it is no longer acceptable for a parliamentary committee to set itself up as a public welfare committee, going into anything and everything with every report, setting forth considerations which are far removed from the subject under consideration.
Some 80% of this report entitled “report on the 1998 annual report by the European Commission on protecting the Communities’ financial interests”, on the legal basis of Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure, refers to OLAF, the White Paper, the reform, all sort of subjects covered by other reports, and even other committees, but has nothing to do with what Mr Bösch was supposed to be dealing with.
According to my rights under the Rules of Procedure, I should like my preliminary question, which is a question of principle, to be put to the vote. The Committee on Budgetary Control must stop meddling wholesale, as has been the case recently, with the subject areas of other committees. We have seen rapporteurs, particularly Mrs Theato, obstructing documents outside their own area of competence for weeks at a time. Some of us are starting to become annoyed. In this specific instance, I move that this report be deemed inadmissible and that we move on to the report which is the next item on the agenda. I request that this be put to the vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples