Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-04-13-Speech-4-071"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20000413.3.4-071"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Madam President, this is a compromise amendment which was negotiated among groups and then, of course, examined by the various groups last night. Our Group supports this compromise amendment with, however, the exception of one word: " . Presumably the English version is "more proportional". We cannot accept that word. However, under the Rules, it is not possible to ask for a split vote on a compromise amendment. I note that if Amendments Nos 100 and 101 were both to be adopted, it would come to exactly the same text as this compromise amendment, except for the problematic word "more". As I know that colleagues in other groups had exactly the same problem with this word, I would suggest to friends and colleagues that it might be appropriate not to accept the compromise amendment but to vote instead in favour of both Amendments Nos 100 and 101, which are compatible, and that would achieve precisely the result desired by many people."@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
""plus""1
"plus proportionnelle""1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph