Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-04-13-Speech-4-050"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-04-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000413.3.4-050"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-04-13-Speech-4-0512
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Louis Bourlanges2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2002-03-07)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Union pour la démocratie française (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I tabled this amendment, along with 37 colleagues from the European People’s Party, because I was appalled at the way the media had exploited the explanatory statement which, as everyone should know but obviously does not, is the responsibility of the rapporteur and in no way commits the House. I was struck by the contradiction in tone between the explanatory statement and the content of the resolution. They are radically different. That is why I tabled this amendment. Having said that, I think you are right, Madam President, to declare it admissible because the vote this amendment involves is not a vote for or against the explanatory statement, but is simply intended to highlight the distance between that explanatory statement and the resolution. After the explanations given by both Mrs Stauner and Mrs Theato, who has stated publicly in the clearest possible way that the explanatory statement is only the responsibility of the rapporteur and in no way commits the House, I consider the amendment no longer necessary, and that is why I am withdrawing it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph