Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-29-Speech-3-158"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2001 budgetary guidelines2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000329.9.3-158"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-29-Speech-3-1592
lpv:speaker	lp:Brigitte Langenhagen2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 member; CONT (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3,3 member; PECH (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, naturally, the question of employment also plays a decisive part during budgetary discussions in the Committee on Fisheries. Healthy growth and low unemployment are what we all want. Europe needs to set the framework, which is one of the reasons it created the Treaty of Amsterdam. But the real responsibility for employment, and this is not the first time that I have stressed this, lies with the Member States. A alone, such as that for which provision has been made in Germany, is not a practice which makes perfect. It is in practice that a Member State demonstrates at home if it is being innovative or if it is hiding with an innocent expression behind the EU. That would be cheap and it would not be right. We need to manage a plethora of international fisheries agreements and conventions over the coming year, all of which have budgetary implications, because if we want to keep our products on the global market, we need raw materials and imports and they do not come cheap. However, we in the Committee on Fisheries cannot really go to town, Commissioner, because you have still not provided us with the long-promised cost-benefit analyses on our fisheries agreements. How can we stand up to the Committee on Budgets’ demand for rigour in these circumstances? The EU will have a new fisheries policy from 2002, a huge, fascinating venture with a global dimension. We are already making the necessary preparations, which is why we also need the strong guidelines planned by the main rapporteur in the fisheries sector. Later we will need the commensurate funds."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph