Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-15-Speech-3-244"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000315.7.3-244"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
I have two points to make, Mr Seppänen. Firstly, if that was how Parliament saw things, we could even give not twenty, but thirty answers to honourable Members’ questions. But I shall reply in 15 seconds, omitting the detail which would reflect the presidency’s desire to deal more thoroughly with questions and to go as far as possible in giving specific replies to honourable Members’ concerns. But we can also opt for a bureaucratic, officious, quick, artificial and probably unsatisfactory answer. We would then – in quantitative terms – be more successful in giving answers to this House.
I have been here since 9 o’clock in the morning and I do not think that the Council can be accused of not doing a serious job in answering honourable Members’ questions. With regard to your question about this disagreement between Parliament and the Commission, it is obvious that the Council would be the last institution to get involved in this disagreement and will leave those two institutions to sort out this potential argument between them."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples